Comparison of Imaging Severity Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated COVID-19 Patients: Perspective of an Indian District.

BACKGROUND: Extensive vaccination drives undertaken globally helped in the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but different nations adopted different vaccination policies to tackle the disease. The vaccination drive in India began with the administration of two different vaccines: Covishield and Covaxin. We assessed the effect of vaccination status on imaging severity in patients with positive COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)/antigen tests. METHOD: This was a single-center retrospective observation analysis carried out over three months between March 1, 2021, to May 31, 2021. Data access was provided by the District Hospital Review Board (DHRB) and the Department of Health (DOH), District Ambala, Haryana. Appropriate statistical tools were used to analyze the data. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 26.0 and Python 3.9 were used for statistical analysis and visualization, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The total sample size of the study was 1,316, out of which 371 (28.2%) were vaccinated and 945 (71.8%) were not vaccinated. The mean age of the study participants was 49.6 ± 15.7 years. Seven hundred ninety-seven (60.6%) participants were male, while 519 (39.4%) participants were female. A statistically significant reduction was observed in the computed tomography severity score (CTSS) of the vaccinated population compared to the non-vaccinated group (χ2 = 74.3, p < 0.001). Vaccination led to a statistically significant decrease in mean CTSS across all lung lobes. CONCLUSION: Emerging COVID-19 variants challenge the effect of available vaccines, with different nations adopting different vaccination strategies to deal with the ongoing health problem. CTSS was employed as an objective marker to study the disease severity and effect of vaccination. Vaccination resulted in a significant reduction in CTSS seen on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) chest scans. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of severe COVID-19 pneumonia among vaccinated individuals. We need more observational data to corroborate the efficacy of vaccines presented in the randomized trials. Sharing such data between different nations can help us adopt a unifying vaccination strategy and decrease the impact of COVID-19 in subsequent disease waves.

Diagnostic Value of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Scan in COVID-19: Do We Need to Think Outside the Box?

Background and objective The ambiguous nature and high infectivity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have caused soaring morbidity and mortality worldwide. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is preferred for detecting COVID-19. However, its poor sensitivity and the emerging use of high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan for disease severity make the use of RT-PCR quite obsolete. In light of this, our study aimed to explore the beneficial role of HRCT and compare the HRCT findings across various patient demographics and parameters. Methods This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. All patients underwent a chest HRCT scan preceded by RT-PCR testing. We used the CT severity score (CTSS) of the chest to calculate disease severity. Demographical data and results of radiological findings were tabulated and compared across RT-PCR positivity, age, and gender. Independent samples t-test and chi-square test were used to analyze the data. Results Glass ground opacity was the most prevalent finding in 99% of the patients, followed by lymph node involvement, consolidation, and crazy-paving pattern. Pleural effusion was observed in only 10% of the patients while pericardial effusion and hiatal hernia were present in 5%. In RT-PCR-positive patients, the posterior basal segment of the lower lobe of the right and left lungs were found to be dominantly involved; however, the upper and middle lobes of the right lung were more commonly involved than the left lung. The mean CTSS was significantly higher in patients aged above 50 years (p<0.001). The mean CTSS of RT-PCR-negative patients was higher than that of RT-PCR-positive patients (15.18 vs. 14.31, p=0.537). Conclusion RT-PCR has a limited role in the diagnosis of COVID-19. The HRCT scan can detect typical COVID-19 findings even in patients with negative RT-PCR results. Moreover, the use of HRCT scan in determining the disease severity and extent of lung damage can lead to a better assessment of critically ill patients.